
The Challenge: American schools are short on qualified, capable teachers in science, technology, engineering and math – key fields in the 21st century economy - and new teachers in those fields often leave the profession after a few years.
A Solution: The UTeach program, started in Texas and now expanded across the country through the support of the National Math and Science Initiative, has graduated thousands of new STEM teachers, and 80% of them stick with the profession.
(Source: National Center for Education Statistics)
Funders of this program include ExxonMobil, which is also a sponsor of the 2012 Education Nation summit.

AUSTIN, Texas – It was the first day of class, and Chris Costello's instructions to a group of college students in a science building at the University of Texas-Austin were evoking giggles.
"Imagine you're a third-grader," Costello, a teaching assistant, told the class. "What's something that can fly?"
"Superman!" one student called out. "A bird," said another. "A fly," a third shouted. Next, Costello and the course instructor, Shelly Rodriguez, handed out worksheets and brightly colored safety scissors. The students cut out and folded origami "helicopters" and set about throwing them in the air, noting how fast and in which direction they spun.
The lesson was the difference between independent and dependent variables in scientific experiments, a concept that most students in the class – which included chemistry, biology and mechanical-engineering majors – had mastered long ago.
But the point was not for these college students to learn something new about variables; it was to help them decide whether they wanted to take their knowledge and pass it on.
"As math and science people, we don't always see ourselves as teachers, but I hope you'll keep an open mind," said Rodriguez, who, like Costello, is a former high school teacher. Her pitch was the first step in a special program at the University of Texas known as UTeach, an effort to entice talented math and science majors who might otherwise become doctors or engineers to choose teaching instead. It was developed in answer to a growing crisis in American education.
For more than a decade, educators have been sounding an alarm about the dismal performance of American students in math and science.
They cite grim statistics: Less than a third of eighth-graders scored proficient in science on the National Assessment of Student Progress in 2011 and slightly more than a third passed on math.
As a result, the United States is also quickly losing its status as a world leader in science and technology, according to a landmark report published in 2005 by The National Academies, a nonprofit research group. In 2008, approximately 5 million undergraduate degrees were awarded in science and engineering. Of those, Chinese students accounted for 23 percent, European Union students earned 19 percent, and the United States received only 10 percent.
This summer, the Obama administration announced plans to create a new master teaching corps in science, technology, engineering and math, known as STEM studies. Educators, along with the Obama administration, are also increasingly embracing UTeach, which has spread to 33 universities in 16 states.
In the 2005 National Academies report, UTeach was cited as a model that could "transform the quality of our science and mathematics teaching." Last year, Congress passed the America COMPETES Act, which includes funding to replicate the UTeach model in other universities. UTeach was conceived in 1998, when a group of high school teachers and professors at the University of Texas-Austin gathered to discuss what to do about the state of STEM education in local schools.
Although occasionally college professors and students would visit local K-12 classrooms to teach a lesson or two, these were "not durable solutions," recalls Michael Marder, a physics professor at the university.
"There are large (teacher) shortages" in math and science classes in high school, Marder said.
"This was clearly a place where the university was well-placed to make changes."
Mary Ann Rankin, then dean of the university's College of Natural Sciences, invited the high school teachers to come up with their ideal program for training new math and science teachers — the kind they wished they had before entering the classroom. Professors from both the education school and from the math and science departments then tweaked that curriculum.
The result was a series of courses that combine practical teaching experience — before committing to the program, students must teach lessons at a real school to see if they like it – with educational, mathematical and scientific theory.
"We wanted to change it so they weren't taking generic education classes, but what … you need to teach math and science," said Mary Walker, a former high school chemistry teacher who helped design the UTeach curriculum.
Traditionally, education colleges have trained math and science teachers, in contrast to the partnership between the math, science and education faculties in the UTeach program. The curriculum is intense, but also relatively condensed. It is also heavily focused on inquiry-based teaching, which means fewer lectures and more student-led group work, like the helicopter exercise, and long-term projects.
Administrators say the program has exceeded expectations. Between 2000 and 2011, 746 students graduated from the UT-Austin program (only nine students graduated in the first cohort). The total national enrollment in UTeach programs is now 5,574. And more than 80 percent of alumni are still in the classroom after five years -- an impressive number considering that half of teachers nationally leave the profession in that period.
Most importantly, some evidence suggests that UTeach alumni are improving the performance of their students, administrators say. UTeach administrators observe new teachers once they enter the classroom, says Marder, who is now co-director of the program. The program has not yet published the results, though. “We’re working to gather that data,” Walker said.
Schools in Austin, where UTeach alumni make up 20 percent of math and science teachers, have seen big improvements in those subjects, however, which may have something to do with the program’s efforts.
It also found that more than 70 percent of the new teachers scored well on classroom management, presentation of material and knowledge, though most needed to work on teaching skills, such as using good questioning strategies.
Manor New Tech High School, in a small town just east of Austin, offers more evidence that the program can improve student achievement. The school opened in 2007 with a math and science faculty comprised entirely of UTeach alumni. So far, the school has performed above average on state math and science tests and graduated nearly all of its students, half of whom qualify for free- or reduced-price lunches available to low-income students. And 100 percent of those who graduate go on to college, says the principal, Steven Zipkes.
"We have more room to be creative. I like that we're allowed to do independent work," said Dharma Casey, a 14-year-old freshman in a biotechnology class taught by UTeach alum Stephanie Hart. It's a contrast to her middle school experience, she added. "We did a lot of stuff out of the book last year."
It's UTeach's focus on making discovery and creativity integral to the study of math and science that has drawn in many new teachers who might have gone on to more prestigious or better-paid jobs. Janice Trinidad, a teacher at Manor New Tech who has a Ph.D. in physics, says her own education was mostly lecture classes that were "very teacher centered."
"There are some students in this school who wouldn't have survived the way I was taught," she said.
This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, nonpartisan education-news outlet based at Teachers College, Columbia University.
course instructor
The UTeach Task Force is part of the College of Natural Science’s external advisory council and is made up of friends of the college. The Task Force engages in fundraising, gives advice on direction and champions ideas to other universities on behalf of UTeach.
Dean of College of Natural Sciences, UT-AustinUTeach is a partnership between the College of Natural Sciences and the College of Education. Before UTeach is replicated on a new campus, the university must agree to create the program as a collaboration between the two colleges.
Dean of College of Education, UT-AustinUTeach is a partnership between the College of Natural Sciences and the College of Education. Before UTeach is replicated on a new campus, the university must agree to create the program as a collaboration between the two colleges.
Co-Director UTeach, Assoc. Dean & Professor of PhysicsUTeach co-directors run the daily operations and work closely together to ensure the program’s goals are reached.
Co-Director UTeach, Assoc. Professor Curriculum and InstructionUTeach co-directors run the daily operations and work closely together to ensure the program’s goals are reached.
UTeach-Austin has numerous partnerships with area school districts wherein the program places students in teaching positions while they are still enrolled at the University of Texas.
UTeach master teachers are veteran K-12 teachers committed to providing continuous support and leadership to UTeach students.
In the beginning, funding was one of the biggest challenges. When UTeach initially launched, it was funded with “soft money” — money that runs out after a certain time period — including grants from the Sid Richardson Foundation and the Hewlett-Packard Corporation. “We had a train running down the railroad full speed and were constantly needing money to lay down the track ahead of it,” says Michael Marder, associate dean for science and math education in the College of Natural Sciences at UT-Austin. Eventually, program administrators were able to convince the university to help fund UTeach using university revenue streams (mostly from tuition.) The program was also able to build a $10 million endowment; the interest from the endowment provides more than $300,000 a year to the program.
An ongoing challenge is collaboration between the three different groups that participate in and run the program: secondary teachers, education school faculty, and math and science school faculty. One issue is just dealing with egos and personalities.
“There’s a lot of education-college bashing going on [nationally,] and at the same time, math and science faculty tend to get a pass,” says Marder. “One group is fairly used to being criticized. The other group is used to being praised even when they don’t deserve it.”
The different groups also bring different visions of what teacher education should involve. For example, as the curriculum for the courses were being developed, the high school teachers wanted more of an emphasis on practical classroom skills, while the faculty pushed more for coursework focused on academic knowledge.
“It sounds quite dry and boring, but the discussions became quite heated,” Marder says.
These interviews were conducted by MSNBC's Alex Witt. They have been edited and condensed.

RE: There are a lot of teachers colleges all across this country. What is different about preparing students to be teachers here at UTeach?
LA: I don't want to say that we're necessarily better than everyone else, but we are different than many other places in the fact that we actively recruit students that come here not intending to be teachers. The majority of the students in our program come to this university to earn a degree to go on into research, to become doctors, to seek other careers and we convince them through a number of little tricks to give this a try and by the time they graduate - although they are fully qualified to go to medical school and many of them are accepted to medical school - 90 percent of them choose to go into the classroom.

RE: Okay, what's with the tricks?
LA: Well, we start off by inviting students with a letter from the dean of the college of natural sciences, which is where these students are admitted, to try a class that's one credit at no cost. And we put ‘em out in a classroom and if they like it, then they'll try out another one. So we give them another one at the same deal, we put them out in another classroom with some guidance and support and they go out in the public schools and they get a sense of whether they might like to be teachers. And about half of the ones that try it stay with us.

RE: Can you talk to me about the growth of this program since 1997?
LA: The buzz about our program probably in 2004, 2005 started to be so great that we got calls from lots of other places that wanted to come to see what we were doing. And along the way it became clear that some of them would like to try to emulate our program, so we've created a support system for other institutions who want to replicate the UTeach program. We have over 30 universities around the country now that are duplicating it.

RE: So it seems by the time students graduate they have a solid notion of what they would be getting into in the classroom because indeed they would've been in the classroom, is that correct?
LA: At the beginning of the program and throughout the program we give them experiences in the public schools. We call it field experience because they're practicing to be a teacher, they need to see what teaching is like in real world schools. And so at the beginning we give early, easy experience. Later on, they get very challenging experiences because that's what they're gonna get if they're teachers. And throughout that sequence of courses probably half the students that try at the very beginning decide it's not for them, while the other half make up the graduates of our program.

RE: Is that a bad thing? That students decide it's not for them?
LA: Not at all, we're happy that students make an early decision and choose other things, they have lots of options.



