In California, law requires teachers to stay in the curriculum 80% of the time. Curriculum is usually the state approved, district adopted text. As each state currently operates under their own set of standards, and textbook/curriculum publishers often "reverse engineer" textbooks so they can sell the same basic text in many diferent markets (the "too many cook" syndrom), can we trace student performance to a curriculum that is 1) framed by state standards that are often in and of themselves disjointed and lack a cohesive flow, 2) beholden to too many incompatable standards, and 3) is creating a dynamic that results in lessons that are, by and large, isolated, disjointed, and factoid presenting, "rolodex card" making snippets of information? Is it possible that the very act of teachers doing what they are expected to do by teaching from the the curricular text books, the natural outcome is a body of students that are flummoxed by experiences that apparently do not support sense making and authentic learning in the minds of children?
* Last updated by: DaveRussell on 9/24/2011 @ 3:01 AM *





